I had two reactions when I read this article abou a sociology professor at Hamline who received complaints from students about his teaching and classes. First, I thought, this could happen to me or one my colleagues; But then I read this (italicized emphasis is mine):
One evening in early December of 2004, a missive written by undergraduates Maisue Xiong and Colin Smith was posted on office doors around Hamline. It laid out criticisms of the "Racial and Cultural Minorities" course as taught by veteran professor Martin Markowitz. The critique also appeared as an op-ed piece in the student newspaper, the Oracle, under the headline, "Professor ignoring diversity, students." It accused Markowitz of disrespect toward minority students and unwillingness to allow open discussions of racism in his class.
The issue largely lay dormant until the beginning of February, when Markowitz's 1,400-plus-word rebuttal was published in the Oracle. As Markowitz described the dispute, it began when Xiong approached him after class and questioned his curriculum and teaching style. Specifically, she thought that the course was "too Jewish" and that the professor was "oppressing her voice."
...Markowitz closed the letter by excoriating those who had criticized him. "We might want to examine very carefully the obvious satisfaction derived by a sanctimonious few who seem to always know what the university should do regarding, for example, matters of ethnicity, equality, and diversity," he bristled. "Claimed certitude can be and too often is a thin disguise for misguided zealotry."
"Claimed certitude" is the sort of thing such profs have espoused for 30-40 years: they know what is best for society, whether the issue is the minimum wage, smokers' rights, etc. and their job is to use their pulpits to set things straight, and now some are getting a taste of their own medicine.
My colleague, Bob Simonson, had this to say in an email to me (which I post with his permission):
The last thing anyone should attempt in an educational institution today is education. Students are now under the impression that education is simply an “exchange” of opinions and feelings – with “understanding and celebration” as the final result. No idea or feeling, no matter how ridiculous, is without merit. Students are entitled to honor roll status and certification of their intellectual abilities (through graduation) because they shared their opinions with each other.
The liberals started this slippery slope on college campuses. I’m happy to see them beginning to get caught in the web that they so meticulously weaved over the past 45 years.
HT to King.